Aida Simonia Biography

Try the literature selection service. You can always turn off the advertisement. Burma Joined the Un Soon after Winning Independence in Myanans with the United Nations is long and difficult. Now it is difficult to imagine that the young independent state of the Burmese Union in the first decade of its existence pursued an active foreign policy. It joined the UN shortly after introducing independence in Burma pursued a firm policy of neutrality and non -compilation, participated in disarmament conferences, sought to establish friendly relations with all key countries.

It was a stressful period in the midst of the Cold War, serious events took place in the world from the Arabizrail conflict and the Caribbean crisis before the war in Vietnam and the invasion of Soviet troops in Czechoslovakia. At a gala meeting at the UN headquarters dedicated to this date, the current Secretary General of the UN Pan Hi Moon noted a great contribution to Tan to the processes of discharge of tension during the Cold War and expressed hope for the best future of his country1.

Under all governments and regimes, the UN provided and provides Burma with economic assistance. Although she had never been large -scale, it was very diverse in its structure. After G., close attention to political processes in Myanmar from the UN, after holding a universal election in the National Assembly in the UN, was included in this process due to the facts of human rights violations, widespread in the country, and in the hope of helping democratic transformations.

The annual resolutions of the UN GAC are urged by the Myanmar government to implement democratic reforms in the country, in accordance with the veto in the city, China successfully limits the role of the Security Council in solving Burmese problems. He could not imagine how China many years after his death could thank the Burma’s military regime using his status.

At the beginning of G. as noted above, the UN Council of Security Council is extremely heterogeneous, which was demonstrated in January G. The situation was repeated after the suppression of the Sharnova Revolution in September G. Ten days were required by the UN Security Council to prepare an application in connection with the initiation of a criminal case on May 14, China objected to sharp formulations and demanded their mitigation.

As a result, an application for the press was issued, this document actually repeated the previous two statements, which contained the usual calls for dialogue with the opposition and ethnic minorities to achieve national reconciliation and the requirements to free all political prisoners, including the aun of San Su Zhi3. He allegedly went unnoticed by the lake with home -made fins and a five -liter plastic bottle as improvised means.

Due to his complaints of extreme fatigue and exhaustion, the compassionate housewives allowed him to linger in the house for a day. On the way back, he was arrested. Then, Aun San Su Zi and her companion with a daughter for the defendants about the uninvited guest were arrested and sent to prison Aun San Su Zhi. Such an accusation entails a prison term of up to five years. According to the inadequate “guest”, he was a “vision” that an attempt was being prepared for the leader of the opposition and he allegedly had to warn her.

This incident has become a “gift of fate” for the military junta. Aun San Su Ji was again sent under house arrest for another year and a half, thus, isolating it from participating in political life in anticipation of the American, who were scheduled to G., was sentenced to seven years in prison, but three days later he was released and taken to his homeland by the American senator.

The Japanese professor Yozo Yokoto GG worked in this post. Lallah - gg. From May, even before the decision on the establishment of a permanent special speaker of the State Council to restore the legality and law and order of the State Council of Personnel and Development with the UN Human Rights Commission, depending on the assessment of the reports presented by special speakers, to the State Council of the State Council of the State Council for Mysk.

Yozo Yokoto was allowed to visit Myanmar several times, but it was refused to meet with Aun Su Su Ji before her release in July his report, which contained a critical assessment of the person’s rights in Myanmar and the composition of the convened national convention to write the text of the new constitution, caused discontent and disagreement of the country's leadership.

But if the cooperation of Yozo Yokoto with the GSVZP was generally recognized as unsatisfactory, then there was virtually no cooperation of his successor from Mauritania with the military regime. Dr. R. Lallah was denied a visit to the country under the pretext of his bias and bias. His report, prepared in the city, in the statement of the State Council also said that "unbridled criticism and insults to the government of Myanmar are unjustified, inappropriate and unproductive." Dr.

R. Lallah, in turn, accused Yangon of unwillingness to cooperate.His unflattering report led to a further strengthening of sharpness in the resolutions of the UN MA of the UN in Myanmar, and Madeleine Olbright used this document to call Myanmar “international Paria”. After that, the permanent representative of Myanmar at the UN stated that the leadership of his country does not see the point in visiting Myanmar Mr.

R. Lallah before the expiration of his powers. The activity of the next special speaker of the UN Commission on Human Rights Paolo Sergio Pineiro took place on the crest of the waves of changes initiated by the then Prime Minister Khin Newon. Since April, Pineero regularly visited Myanmar. The first six trips were so organized by the receiving side that the special speaker himself appreciated the activities of both parties as “full and unhindered cooperation”.

It was expressed in the possibilities of meetings with the Higher Military leadership of Myanmar, with representatives of the opposition National League for NLD democracy, as well as visits to the national outskirts of the country, in particular, he managed to visit a chance state. The leadership of Myanmar also expressed satisfaction presented in the city of the State Council also highly appreciated the call of P.

Pineiro to support the UN efforts to “involve Myanmar in the international community and cooperation with it”. The desire and readiness of the State Medical University to cooperate with the UN at that time was confirmed by such specific gestures as the liberation of political and other prisoners dedicated to P.'s visits shortly after his fourth visit in October G.

as a whole, in those years, they were released near political prisoners under the subscription that they will continue to engage in political activities. The only question in which the authorities prevented the UN speaker to conduct his own investigation was the fact of the violence of military personnel in relation to channel women, about which there are evidence of the victims, but, which is denied by the government.

As the negotiation process with Aun San Su Ji was delayed and lost strength, the military authorities began to express disappointment in the results of cooperation with P. Pineiro, although it was more productive than in previous years, and despite some progress that was outlined in the country in the GG. In March, Pineiro, during his conversation with a political prison in prison, Insein in Yangon discovered a listening device hidden under the table.

The angry specialist of the UN Human Rights Commission interrupted his visit and left the country. Nevertheless, despite the unpleasant situation for both sides, the gap and the termination of cooperation did not happen then. After the incident in Depayin on May 30, Aun San Su Ji was free. Myanmar authorities, in turn, invited him to visit the country again in November. However, according to the results of the investigation, the specialist came to the conclusion that the attack on the Aun San Su Ji in the village of Depayin could not happen without the knowledge of the authorities5.

Critical conclusions and recommendations contained in subsequent reports by P. Pineiro in August in November only four years later in November of Pineiro allowed to come to the country in order to conduct an independent investigation of the September events. However, his next report, presented in March, in that document, P. Pineiro also expressed doubt about the possibility of a free and honest will at the upcoming national referendum on the project of a new constitution, outlined in May, the transition to democracy cannot be effective without the release of all political prisoners, the legalization of all political parties and without the protection of the main civil and political freedoms, which is not yet in Myanmar, ”the specialist of the UN Human Rights Commission reads.

Soon after this report, Paolo Sergio Pineiro resigned the powers of a special speaker. In May of G., his first introductory visit to Myanmar took place in August in the report on the results of the first trip, he outlined his proposals to exercise progress in the field of human rights, consisting of four points: a revision of internal legislation that limits the basic civil rights; the liberation of prisoners of conscience in prisons and under house arrest; reforming the training system for military personnel in military schools and academy, with the introduction of the main provisions on the observance of human rights; Reform proceedings so that it becomes completely independent and uncontrolled.

These four points, according to T. Okhea Kuantans, should be completed before holding universal elections in the city of he demonstrated a new approach to his position. If the activities of his three predecessors were mainly in the documentation and classification of facts of violation of human rights in Myanmar, then the Argentine lawyer took a step forward.

He is trying to figure out the nature and mechanism of these violations. His second trip to Myanmar in February, he met with three key figures in the justice system - the Minister of the Interior, the Minister of Justice and the Supreme judge.The first is a military, two others are appointed by the military. Although all three perform the most important state functions, but, like all functionaries in Myanmar, they are not independent.

According to T. Ohaa Kuantans, it is important to understand how human rights violations occur and what can be done with this8. During his six -day visit, the UN specialist visited the Karensky state, where one of the oldest in the world for more than 60 years of anti -government movements was born.

But he was refused the possibility of visiting the Kachin state and Rakhain, who is now in hearing due to the mass flight from Myanmar of the Muslim ethnic nationality of the Rohingya from hopeless poverty and oppression by the authorities. Both political activists were arrested in August.