Lyatoshinsky Nikolai biography
About Pushkin and not only the essay “We will press the Slavs to the wall! Two peaks of Russian poetry, great thinkers and patriots of Russia. They never had a chance to meet. Pushkin never went beyond the borders of the Russian Empire, on the contrary, he spent most of his life in Europe. However, when after Pushkin’s death, Tyutchev returned to Russia, the closest to Russia, the closest to Russia.
His friends were the former friends of Alexander Sergeyevich, Chaadaev, Prince of Vyazemsky, Turgenev, it should be noted that they also despised the same people, in particular, the crus of Nesselrode and his surroundings, usually in January, I re -read my favorite books about Pushkin. To plunge into the world of Alexander Sergeyevich, to refresh the long -standing acquaintance with Prince Peter Vyazemsky and his wife, with Natalya Nikolaevna, with Zhukovsky, with Delvig, Danzas, Padnov in different years, more precisely, the winter, reading these books took place in different orders, but in this January I felt that it was simply necessary to start with the book of Vadim Kozhinov, with Tyutchev, with the book of Vadimov, Those pages that say about Pushkin’s relationship with Nesselrode and the original version of the reason for the last duel of Pushkin.
At that time, I was not yet aware of why I wanted to read about this, but in the process of reading the answer appeared by itself, it is known that the special military operation currently in Ukraine is different. Some look deeper into the essence of things and understand the true reasons for the situation, others are turned out to be arrogant, with their own category of our citizens with arrogance and even a prosperity to their own country, they are ultimate and pour out bile.
Or maybe the matter is not at all superficial, but frank hatred of Russia or love for money, to 30 pieces of cuts that their foreign owners pay them. However, there is nothing new in this. Some representatives of the Russian intelligentsia have always been characterized by the defeat of their country in the Crimean War, and in the Russian-Japanese, and in the rest.
As you can see, the current fifth column does not forget these "glorious" traditions. Moreover, it is impossible not to recognize the main thing - the collective West once again united in a new crusade against Russia in an attempt to delay its development. Russia, having exhausted all possible funds in a vain attempt, will achieve real security guarantees from the West, forced to go to extreme measures.
In general, dejavu. However, back to Alexander Sergeyevich. And in another letter: "Much has remained in this matter the dark and mysterious for ourselves." Copies of the letter were received by some friends and acquaintances of the poet. Since it was at this time that Natalia Nikolaevna persistently persecuted the young handsome Georges Dantes, the adoptive son of the Bollya Messenger of Heckern, Pushkin sent a challenge to the duel to Dantes.
The next morning, Geckern rushed to the poet and began to beg him to cancel the duel. Pushkin, which in itself, already strangely agreed to postpone a duel for a day. But Geckern appeared again in tears the next day, asked and begged again and Pushkin again agreed to postpone the duel for two weeks, and then canceled on November 17 completely. And here it should be noted: yes, the first reaction to Pasquil from Alexander Sergeyevich was more emotional than rational and already after a short period of time, Pushkin began to understand that it was not in Dantesa.
And not at all because Dantes unexpectedly made an offer to the sister of Natalia Nikolaevna Catherine. Pushkin initially saw in Dantes a spoiled frivolous pier, but not a fatal opponent, who certainly caused jealousy, but no more. Years have passed, but even today in the wide circles of even the reading book of the audience, it is generally accepted that the cause of the last duel A.
Pushkin was his jealousy, that Georges Dantes was harassed by Natalia Nikolaevna, and that, as they say, "there is no smoke without fire." However, this version in a particular edition has always existed, and in the book of Veresaev about Pushkin, my beloved, this point of view prevails. Yes, and how to think differently! A brilliant beauty, an irresistible young Frenchman and, albeit a famous, but not a beautiful husband.
And then there are balls, intrigues, secular pranks and entertainment! Nevertheless, as we have already said, many close friends of Pushkin admitted that the story of the last fight Alexander Sergeyevich is dark and mysterious. Who was the author of an anonymous letter? Was it one person or a group of enemies of the poet? What did they achieve and what goal did they want to achieve?
Pushkin himself was inclined to consider the author of the vile anonymous hekkern, and Dantes only a puppet in the clever hands of an old villain. This is partly why he did not feel great hatred of a young crook, who searched glory and money in Russia in any way. This explains the fact that Pushkin agreed to a delay, and then completely canceled the duel. So maybe the authors of the "diploma" expected that the anger of the offended poet would not fall at all in Dantes, but on someone else?
Question: To whom?Vadim Kozhinov says that the issued Soviet diplomat Chicherin, in correspondence with the dandelon author of the famous book about the last duel Pushkin, directly says that the author of Pasquil was Brunnov. It should be noted that Chicherin came from a family of hereditary Russian diplomats and from childhood could be a witness to conversations of very competent people and his words deserve attention and trust.
Brunnov F. in the Russian diplomatic service he was a year old, for ten years he was the closest personal assistant to the Foreign Minister Nesselrode, who then appointed Brunnov to the most prestigious post of a messenger in London at that time. Interestingly, in the years, Brunnov served as an official of special assignments under Count Vorontsov in Odessa. Also, from the memoirs of Liprandi it is known that he had clashes with Pushkin, who disgusted Brunnov's repentance before his superiors.
Chicherin believed that Brunnov’s “diploma” was ordered by Countess Nesselrode, the wife of the cartridge. Prince A. Golitsyn recalled the words of Emperor Alexander the Second: “The poet himself guessed about this, but assumed that hekkern was the direct manufacturer of Pasquil.
However, even if Baron Gekkern was not the author of a vile letter, he was undoubtedly familiar with him. Count and Countess Neselrode, Brunnov, some previous world, who hated Pushkin, just like that. And all of the Russian, as well as Russia itself, constituted a fairly large party at that time and certainly had a huge impact on the emperor’s sovereign, and therefore, on the policy of the good, this was the true reason that the poet was insulting anonymous, but not with Pushkin to cause jealousy and provoking a duel and provoking a duel and provoking a duel.
Dantes. No, the attackers aimed much higher! There was gossip that the emperor was supposedly enthusiastic about the beautiful Natalya Nikolaevna, and, according to the calculation of the authors of the “diploma”, Pushkin was supposed to be jealous of his wife not to the windy Donzhuan Dantes, namely to the king. Thus, behind the authors anonymous were primarily the Nesselrode spouses.
Alien, who did not learn the Russian language, despised and hate Russia and all Russian, of course, hated Pushkin. However, trying to set the poet on the king and thereby call him, the poet, inevitable death, they, as it were with a ricochet, tried to harm the king himself, and hence the entire Russian Empire. The famous biographer of Pushkin and Tyutchev, a life researcher, Georgy Chulkov, wrote in the year: “Madame Nesselrode, who hated Pushkin, she was a worthy companion of her wife, Count Nesselrode, the Lake of Mitternich in the Neselrode salon, the independence of his judgments annoyed this oligarchic gang.
Nearly years have passed, but how little the attitude of our European has changed. "Partners" to Russia and to patriotic writers, poets, cultural figures, and generally to the people. And in Russian society itself, pro -Western, pro -American liberal figures, including in higher circles, are still openly acted, which in the same way that Nesselrode at one time with its patrons and subordinates do not miss the opportunity to insert sticks into the wheels of Russian statehood, water Russia and the Russian people with dirt and do everything possible to slow down the development of Russia.
The onslaught on our country for an undisguised purpose to destroy it, breaking into several small puppet states, like today's Ukraine, led to the fact that Russia was forced to begin special military opposition to demilitarization and denazing of this once beautiful Soviet republic. You do not need to be a historian to understand that attempts to destroy Russia have been made and are made by “civilized” Europe regularly.
The united under Napoleon’s leadership attacked our homeland in, the same Europe, but already under the leadership of Nazi Germany, attacked the USSR in the year. And between these world wars there was still the Crimean war of the CHG. Is it by chance that those involved in the creation of a false Pasquil, which led to the death of the great Russian poet, were involved in criminal acts and "mistakes", which contributed to the fact that Russia was at war with the united Europe in the year?
Without going into details, it is safe to say that this is all the same ubiquitous Nesselrode, Brunnov and other representatives of the Higher Belarus of the Russian Empire close to them. But Nesselrode himself, together with his wife, who became the organizer of the death of Pushkin, was the son of a famous Mason, belonging to what was usually inherited, made his career precisely due to this circumstance.
It would seem that the connection between the death duel of the poet and the so -called zero Crimean world war, because between these events as many as 18 years! But the facts are a stubborn thing: the same people first prepared a conspiracy against the great national poet, then they also prepared a conspiracy against an entire state, against Russia in the same vile and false ways.And behind the back of these scum, as usual, stood the so -called civilized Europe, the main goal of which over the centuries was the all -terrible weakening and destruction of Russian statehood.
Another great Russian poet - Fedor Tyutchev wrote about this with pain. He happened to serve for many years under the leadership of Nesselrode and be personally familiar with Brunov, yes, undoubtedly deja vu. All the same faces, all the same methods and still the same goal. In the last years of his life, Alexander Sergeyevich stated himself louder as a Russian patriot and, at the same time, his influence on the minds of thinking people, students, aristocrats, and after all, on the king himself became increasingly tangible.
He incredibly annoyed and aroused hatred among cynical cosmopolitans such as Nesselrode and Heckern, and among the same cosmopolitans from among the Russian aristocracy. How it looks like the modern "fifth column" of our liberals, the artistic "elite" and other moral freaks, who are constantly and invariably ashamed of their country, for the fact that they are Russian or Russian -speaking.
In the time of Pushkin there was no Internet, but fakes, lies, dirty intrigues - everything was the same, and in the same way, with their help, any cosmopolitan sales scum “fought” with everything Russians, and, ultimately, with Russia itself, as a state itself. The united West in the present days is inflated by such Russophobia that the world has not yet seen.
However, you need to understand that Russophobia was both during Pushkin and before him. The Russian Empire, and in essence, the Russian civilization, which has covered the colossal territory, including Alaska and Central Asia, reached the col way, which was ruled by the Russian governor of the Baranov. Today we are constantly heard from high -ranking Western politicians that Russia is too large in the territory, that it got too many natural wealth, and therefore, it must be divided into many small states that could be robbed with impunity.
Yes, so, more than once. But in every crusade of hypocritical and cynical Europe and the countries of the Anglo-Saxon orientation against Russia there is something new. Now, for example, the spiritual degradation of the Old World is quite obvious, the frank decline of moral values that the West is trying to replace with pathos rhetoric about freedom and democracy.
Russia, on the contrary, has a chance to make a powerful passionate jerk, based on its own strength and traditional spiritual, moral values. At the same time, we must remember the story that European intriguers, as once with Pushkin, are beaten precisely according to spirituality, by the moral power of the Russian people. One great Russian poet, Pushkin, fell victim to the vile conspirators, the other great poet, Tyutchev, many years later the same conspirators accused of criminal acts that pushed Russia of the Crimean War fire, and the conspirators were all the same hypocritical Eurocentric figures and Russian aristocrats, despised by Russia.