What is the biography of Yeshua

Elena Bulgakova, according to the literary critic Marietta Chudakova, if you conduct a survey of readers of the novel by Mikhail Afanasyevich Bulgakov “Master and Margarita” on the topic: who, in your opinion, is Yeshua Ga-Notskri, the majority will be sure: the prototype of Jesus Christ. Someone will call him a true God; Someone by an angel preaching the doctrine of the salvation of the soul, and only a few-a simple man who does not have divine nature.

But is it so? In order to answer this question, we turn to the canonical Gospels, which tells about Jesus Christ, and compare it with the Bulgakovskoye Yeshua Ga-Notskri. I will say right away: I am not a specialist in the analysis of literary texts, but in this case, I believe, they do not need to be in order to doubt the identity of these personalities. Yes, they have a lot in common - both come from Nazareth, both crucified, both forgave what most people could not forgive LC.

But if Ga-Notskri tried to please everyone and God forbid to offend someone, then Christ sometimes allowed himself unpleasant expressions. So, at the treasury in the temple, he publicly called the Pharisees by the children of the devil in. And he did not begging his students about anything, unlike Ga-Notskri, who implored Matvey to burn parchment with the texts of his speeches.

And, of course, it is impossible to imagine that Christ, who said: “I - is the path and truth and life” in. And yet. In the twenty-ninth chapter of the novel to Woland with Azazello at an hour, when they examined the city from the roof of “one of the most beautiful buildings in Moscow”, the Messenger of Ga-Notsri Levi Matvey appeared with a request to take the master and reward him with peace.

It seems to be nothing special-an ordinary, quite realistic scene, if, of course, it is permissible to evaluate the scenes from a mystical novel with such categories of a mystical novel, but you just have to present in the place of the Ha-Notskri Christ, how a completely realistic scene turns into a frankly surrealist. Just think about it: Jesus Christ - God and Son of God - asking for his original enemy Satan!

Not only is it offensive to Christians, which Bulgakov, with all its ambiguous attitude towards Christianity, could not allow, this contradicts the church dogmas-God is omnipotent, it means that he himself is able to solve his problems, and if he cannot solve his problems, he is not omnipotent and, therefore, God, but God is some kind of psychic abilities, the Syrian son of Palestine.

Most names have gospel prototypes in the built -in novel - the prefect of Judea Pontius Pilate, Judas, high priest Kaiafa, guel collector Levi Matthew Matvey - and events occur in the same city of Yershalaim - the Hebrew phonetic version of the pronunciation of Jerusalem. There are other differences between them. So, the thirty-year-old Jesus Christ had twelve scientists followers, and crucified him on the cross, and the twenty-seven-year-old Yeshua Ga-Notsri had one, and crucified him, Ga-notsri, on the pillar.

Question: Why? Then who is he, Yeshua Ga-Notskri? A person who has no divine nature? One could agree with this statement, if it were not for his stormy posthumous activity yourself: in the sixteenth chapter he, being crucified on the pillar, dies, resurrects in the twenty -ninth, meets with Pilate, easily addresses Woland with a request mentioned above.

Woland - it is not clear with what on earth - fulfills it, and then in the best traditions of the Soviet communal apartments will dog with Levius Matvey as if they were familiar with at least two thousand years. All this, it seems to me, is little like the acts of a person who does not possess divine nature. Now it’s just right to ask another question: who came up with a novel about Pilate.

Then why was his first chapters voiced by Woland, who had just arrived in Moscow “at an hour of unprecedentedly hot sunset”? During his meetings with the master, even in his thoughts, he did not attribute authorship for himself. And here are the mysterious words of the master, who said after the poet Ivan the homeless retold the first chapters: “Oh, how I guessed!

Oh, how I guessed everything! Events in the novel that he himself invented, or something else? And is this an affair? The master himself called his work a novel, however, its characteristic features, such as: the branching of the plot, the multiplicity of the plot lines, a large temporary coverage, and did not pamper readers. Then what is it, if not a novel?

Let us recall what the story of the preacher was written off, who, at the representation of the Sanhedrin, led by the high priest Caiafa, sent to the execution the Roman prefect of Judea Pontius Pilate. From the canonical gospels. And if so, maybe it is worth agreeing with some literary studies, calling the work of the master the gospel or the anti -gospel.

A few words about this genre. From the Greek language, the word gospel is translated as good news. In the broad sense of the word - the news of the onset of the Kingdom of God, in the narrow - the news of birth, earthly ministry, death, resurrection and ascension of Jesus Christ.The canonical gospels from Matthew, Mark, Luke, John is called by God -dodgy, that is, written under the influence of the Holy Spirit on the Human Spirit.

And then two questions immediately arise: if the work of the master is really the gospel, who is the person who was influenced by the spirit, and who is the spirit that he drove a man's hand? My answer is this. If we take into account that the angels in the Christian tradition are considered to be creatures devoid of creative principle, then the man acted by the spirit was influenced by the master, and the spirit that acted on the master was the fallen angel Woland.

And then it immediately becomes clear: how the master “guessed everything”, from where Voland knew what was written in the master’s novel before he met him, why Woland agreed to fulfill the request of Yeshua Ga-Notskri-to take him with him and reward with peace. In this regard, an episode of the thirty-second chapter, where the riders who leave Moscow are a master, Margarita, Woland and his retinue, became witnesses to the meeting of Ga-notskri and Pilate.

The master seemed to be waiting for this while he was motionless and looked at the sitting prosecutor. He folded his hands with a hand and shouted so that the echo jumped through the deserted and crazy mountains: “Free! He is waiting for you! Pay attention to the words of Woland, addressed to the master: “So, they found out: from whom the Gospel is written, it remains to answer the main survey: about whose earthly ministry, death, resurrection the good news on its pages sounded, and we finally find out who he is, Yeshua Ga-Notskri.

To do this, we turn to the beginning of the gospel from the master, namely, to the interrogation of the “wandering philosopher” Pontius Pilate. The accusation made by the prefect of the Jews that Ga-Notskri, according to the “testimony of people”, persuaded the people to destroy the church building, the prisoner, denying his guilt, answered: “These good people, Igemon, did not study anything and confused everything that I said.

I generally begin to fear that this confusion will last a very long time. And all due to the fact that he does not write down after me. " Now let's understand. The fact that Ga-Notskri had in mind Levia Matvey-the prototype of the Evangelist Levia Matthew, when he said that he was misunderstood him, has no doubt-Ha-notskri called his name himself at the interrogation of Pilate.

And who did he mean, saying: “These kind people, Igemon, did not study anything and confused everything”? In general, a listening crowd, in particular, those who listened and conveyed his speech to others. Hence the conclusion: since there are no people who listen and report, except Levia Matvey in the Gospel from the master, and the master himself gives the Ga-Notskri for Jesus Christ, it is a question in this replica, apparently, about the evangelists-those who listened and brought the teachings of Christ to those who could not hear him.

And here it turns out that if we imagine Christianity in the form of a building, then at the base of the foundation of this building lies the Old Testament all the apostles, together with Jesus Christ, were Jews and were brought up in the traditions of classical Judaism, the foundation consists of a new covenant reinforced by four cornerstone columns, a superstructure-a wall with a roof, from a sacred legend and labors of modern ones Theologians.

In appearance, this building seems thorough and durable, but it seems so only until someone who pretends himself to be Christ will come and say that the “good people” who created the New Testament Gospels, everything was confused, because they wrote incorrectly after him. Then - you can guess - other people who will say: since the Church stands on defective poles, all believers should leave it for safety purposes: who needs it?

My grandmother, if she is alive, would answer this question like this: “Antichrist, and no one else! But not only to some abstract antichrist, but to a very concrete with the capital letter "a". He definitely needs it. His very name in translation from Greek means: instead of Christ, it is better than any declaration of intentions expresses the meaning of existence and the purpose of life.

How to achieve this? You can, for example, collect the army and give a fight to Jesus Christ under Armageddon, or you can imperceptibly, quiet sapa, supplant His image from the mass consciousness of Christians and will reign in it himself. Do you think this is impossible? But Jesus Christ believed: it was possible to warn: “You can believe or not to believe in these predictions, but if the false christic and false prophet will still come, we will most likely accept them without noticing the substitutions, how long we have not noticed that one of the programs on the historical channel“ Hour of Truth ”preceded the epigraph from the gospel already quoted above.

Masters: “These good people did not study anything and confused everything that I said, I don’t think that the editors of the TV channel sold Satan’s soul, but the fact that none of them, seduced, noticed deception in the words of Ga-notskri shows how easy it is to deceive us. Perhaps this is precisely what Woland was counting on when he “ordered” the master of the Gospel for the attack of the kingdom of Antichrist for a hundred thousand rubles.By the way, it is believed that Woland came to Moscow because it became godless, and left, realizing that his help in the religious degradation of citizens is not needed.

It is unlikely that this is so. Most likely, he left her because he was disappointed in the Muscovites, since believers were required for the accession of the Antichrist, which the townspeople were no longer, what he was able to verify when he visited the Varier Theater. And the fact that Woland convinced Berlioz with Ivan the Bezdomno of Jesus, and, without any evidence and points of view, it seems to me, confirms this version.

But back to Ha-Notskri. Recognizing him with an antichrist, we can explain: why he has one follower, and not twelve, like Jesus Christ, to whom he will imitate his whole life; For what reason he was crucified on the pillar; And why on earth did Woland agree to respect Ga-Notskri's request to give the master peace. So: Ga-Notsri has only one follower in the built-in novel because he also has the same antichrist in the New Testament-a false prophet, whom the Lyonian called “Antichrist’s squire”; The antichrist was crucified on the pillar due to the fact that the crucifix on the cross is a symbol of Christianity, which means to introduce to Christ, which is unacceptable to Him; Woland-Satan could not help but fulfill the request of the Ga-Notskri-antihrist because he was, or maybe: he would be, or is already, his father.

The novel "Master and Margarita" is verbose. He is not only about love and betrayal, a writer and his relationship with the authorities, but also about how Satan, with the help of the writer, wanted to provide the arrival of the Antichrist, as they would now express: “information support”, but in opposition with Muscovites, spoiled by apartment and other “issues” of being, he suffered Fiasco.