Victor Georgievich Martynov Biography
Try the literature selection service. You can always turn off the advertisement. He graduated with honors in the city of the Moscow Institute of Petrochemical and Gas Industry named after I. Gubkin with a degree in Gorny Geophysic Engineer. Labor activity after graduation is connected with scientific and teaching at the university - a junior, senior researcher; Director of the Central Intersectoral Institute for Advanced Educational Institutions of Management Workers and Specialists of Oil and Gas Industry Industry in New Areas of Technology and Technology for Minh and GP named after Gubkina; The first vice -rector in gg.
Moscow; in the city of October, Chairman of the Scientific Council of the University; member of two dissertation tips; Chairman of the Council of UMO universities of the Russian Federation for oil and gas education; Member of the Presidium of UMO in higher education in the field of applied geology. Doctor of Economics, author of more than a hundred scientific and methodological works.
He has state awards. Honorary employee of the gas industry; Honorary employee of the fuel and energy complex; Honorary Worker of Higher Professional Education of the Russian Federation; Laureate of the NTO Award named after Gubkina but they have responsible for his future. And the future of the university has been associated with its rector Viktor Georgievich Martynov for the second year.
We know well that the prestige of the organization is largely determined by its leader. Having passed in his native university all the steps of professional formation, he absorbed his special spirit and rich historical traditions, and becoming the rector, he realized himself as a highly qualified organizer. The university under his leadership develops dynamically and holds the bar of the recognized leader of higher education.
University science has been and remains a guarantor of high quality education. But no school can prepare a specialist once and for all. It is necessary that he can and would like to study all his life. How to teach a student to this, why is the diploma of the University of Gubkin is always valuable, what prospects are waiting for graduates in international companies, we talked about this with the rector of the University Viktor Martynov on the eve of the 8th anniversary of the RSU Oil and Gas named after To the city of the Russian Federation, she sank in the same ranking to e place.
Victor Georgievich, do you think the quality of education has changed during this time? Nevertheless, the education system is too inertial to change so sharply. After all, our power is in scientific and methodological schools, the methodology of training. And this did not go anywhere, even despite the "leakage of the brains" in the X years. Often the results of education are directly proportional to what “material” acts - that is, much depends on the quality of the education of the student.
The number of students in our country increased from G. earlier, in Soviet times, there was a selection when only one out of three came to a higher school. Excellent students and students with an average score of a certificate of 4.5, those who had 3.5 points - to a technical school, with 3 points in vocational schools went to the university. Now there is practically no vocational school, technical schools too - everyone goes to receive higher education.
Naturally, even with a very good educational program, it is impossible to make an excellent student of the university out of the unsuccessful schoolboy. Not everyone has the same abilities. When the formation became so massive, the quality was slightly blurred. Moreover, in the gg. Some of the sensible, competent teachers went to other sectors of the economy, since the salary did not satisfy them.
Those who remained to earn a living since the basic salary of state employees is still very low and does not correlate with the real sector, they worked additionally. Someone earned on science, someone else on something, and as a result, less time was devoted to the educational process. In addition, many teachers were simply old. At the beginning of x the average age earlier, in Soviet times, there was a selection when only one child out of three entered a higher school.
Excellent students and students with an average score of a certificate of 4.5, those who had 3.5 points - to a technical school, with 3 points - in vocational schools of the teaching building of most universities, including ours, amounted to about 50 years. Now this average age is close to the pension, when there is knowledge, and the ability to transfer them is significantly limited.
Moreover, this is a general trend, youth does not go to the university for teaching work. I would also attribute our university to this category. The prestige of Russian education in the oil and gas region not only did not fall, but, on the contrary, even grew up. During the planned economy, we had approximately foreign students, now their number has grown significantly, however, partially due to the CIS countries.
A significant part of graduates seeks to get a job in international oil and gas companies. Many of them have made themselves a very good career over these 20 years, rising to the level of vice presidents of global companies. That is, in terms of level, Russian education in the field of oil and gas is no worse than the leading Western universities. In some cases, I think that we are even better taught.If we send the best abroad, they are the best there, if we send medium, they are there and there.
This happens with both market and planned economics. In the whole country, the same picture. Of course, success depends on both human talent, and on the level of previous education, and, most importantly, on his motivation. The fundamental training is a mutual process for both a student and a university. Our capabilities are very good - technology, education technologies are the most modern.
I would not say that by the level of equipment we are lagging behind Western universities. We have three thousand computers for seven and small thousands of students. In fact, as in the most leading universities in the world. They have one of the main criteria - the percentage of foreign students. But all the same, the same English universities, the same Cambridge, Oxford have a percentage of foreign students twice, three times higher.
They initially positioned themselves as universities of a global scale and were built for teaching students from around the world. Or another criterion - the number of Nobel laureates from among employees and graduates. For example, historically, this indicator is ahead of many Massachusetts Technological University, which collects scientific personnel with around the world for years and decades, laboratories have been created for them, and financial resources are given.
The number of articles in search engines published in various magazines is also of great importance, and these are mainly English -speaking. There are practically no our magazines there, if there are, then no more than one or two. But all the magazines that publish Massachusetts, Cambridge Universities are in the search engine. So all the ratings should be treated calmly. A high rating, of course, is a pleasant thing, but the quality of education does not fully reflect.
This is an external assessment, it may not always be fair for various reasons. But the employer's assessment is the best rating indicator. Almost all of our specialists working abroad, who have left for one reason or another from the country, have constant and highly paid work. Have you noticed a decrease in interest in graduates by employers related to the crisis?
Is it possible to say that they are disassembled directly from the bench? There are no problems with employment now? In the market conditions, some Western companies operating in Russia, such as Shlumberge, Baker Hughes and others, if we send the best abroad, they are the best, if we send medium, they are there and there. But when, having finished the development faculty, a person tries to stay in Moscow - this is not the most successful option.
In Moscow there is no oil production, there are no developed fields. There are central offices of companies and scientific centers, where it is quite difficult to find a job without experience. This is a very good indicator, especially if you count for one person from the scientific and pedagogical personnel of the oil and gas industry to the regions, which is correct from the point of view of building a career, then there are no difficulties with employment.
The competitiveness of graduates of the university is directly proportional to their knowledge and skills on the outcome of training. Excellent excellent students with knowledge of a foreign language are more competitive. In general, applications for graduates of the university are always more than graduates themselves. So it was even in the last crisis year.
As a rule, graduates grow quickly enough and receive high starting salaries, but this, of course, depends on the region in which they work. As far as you know, you are being called the University of Research. What does this name mean by it? Is only scientific developments? This is a very good indicator, especially if you count for one person from scientific and pedagogical staff.
And the idea of a research university is more effective to combine the advantages of science and education in a single complex in the main areas of development, such as rational subsoil use, energy conservation along the entire technological chain from production to processing and sales, ecology. This completely coincides with the priorities of the country's development.
There are still a lot of promising oil and gas reserves, but in order to master them, new technologies, transition to big depths, development of a shelf and new promising areas are needed.
It will also be necessary to master non -traditional sources of hydrocarbons. For example, coal methane, gas hydrates and, of course, an important issue is the disposal of associated oil gas. Although today you will not find a single graduate unemployed.